Being
knowledgeable in legal terminology and precedents in our industry of choice is
vital to maintain a successful business. This knowledge provides a laying
foundation of what to expect if engaging in a legal battle.
We
generally see entertainment public relations professionals in the midst of legal battles
playing the role of firefighters, representing their clients as legislative
public relations representatives, a sub segment of crisis management. Yet, the
public relations industry, especially that related to the entertainment world,
does have legal liabilities, and although not common, from time to time you'll see a public relations representative as one of the parties of a legal feud. These liabilities definitely make the industry
seem less fabulous and more risky than Samantha Jone’s job in Sex and the City.
Working
with public figures brings along certain legal aspects that the artist’s
publicist must be aware of, such as their publicity and privacy rights.
Needless to say, when artists engage in legal battles over their right of
publicity and defamation, their publicists are directly involved as well.
Entertainment public relations professionals can be liable for their content they release directly to the public or that
they create and distribute through their clients. This said, the public could
sue publicists for releasing content that inflicts
emotional distress. A good example of this situation is the recent lawsuit
filed to Kim, Khloé and Kourtney Kardashian from David Goodson. Goodson, a Pennsylvania inmate, sued the Kardashian sisters,
claiming that the “outrageous actions” exposed in their television show caused
him extreme emotional distress. Yet, the
appeals court stated that the sisters' alleged conduct was not sufficiently
outrageous to sustain Goodson's claim. Although Kardashian’s publicist was not directly sued in this
case, it’s important to understand that there is a possibility of the publicist
being involved in cases like this, because after all, it’s the publicist who
develops and markets an artist’s image. Publicists screen and to some extent
develop the content that is going to be released, even in the Kardashian’s
reality show. This said, their publicist becomes liable to some extent.
Another
issue where publicists can become legally liable is when divulging private
information or breaching a confidentially clause. The latest example of this
situation is once again with Kim Kardashian. Shortly after Kardashian filed for
divorce from Kris Humphries, her ex-publicist Jonathan Jaxson publicly claimed
that the couple's marriage was a publicity stunt. Kardashian’s attorney sent a
demand for arbitration claiming Jaxson had violated a confidentiality clause in
his contract with Kim, and seeking a minimum $200,000 in damages. Jaxson, in
return, said he never signed a confidentiality agreement. Even though they settled
for a sum of money and a public apology, this lawsuit brings to our attention
that a publicist must never release confidential information about their
current or former clients and reiterates the importance of carefully reviewing
contacts. While Jaxson’s actions are illegal in contracts with a
confidentiality clause built into it, breaking a confidentially promise
certainly isn’t considered ethical in the public relations world.
Along
the same lines of the Kardashian v. Jaxson issue, a publicist should know the
power of words. Therefore, they shouldn’t say anything that is going to portray
their clients in a false light. This situation can be seen in the highly
publicized lawsuit between the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (Golden
Globes) and their former publicist Michael Russell. Russell alleged that the
HFPA’s members were engaged in a "payola" scheme. The HFPA then filed
a countersuit against Michael Russell, charging him and his firm with breach of
contract and fraud. They sued Russell for breaching a confidentiality clause
and for portraying the Association in false light without evidence. Again, this
case demonstrates the legal liabilities that come along not only with dealing
with entertainment related companies, but by having an unethical behavior
towards your clients.
Other liabilities as publicists
may be misrepresentation, libel or defamation, and wrongful interference. Our
job is not only a very rewarding one, but also a very risky one. We have to be
very careful with the clients we choose and the actions we take because one
false move could destroy our clients’ careers and our professional
reputation.
If you want to read more about a big liability in the entertainment public relations world click here.
If you want to read more about a big liability in the entertainment public relations world click here.
Tiffany Doll,
ReplyDeleteI think that this a very well researched blog "Not-So- Fabulous PR". I love the hyperlinks to the various PR problems of Kim Kardashians celebrity lifestyle.
I believe that if you had included the articles or videos of the "72 Hour Wedding" that it would attack more interest.
Respectively,
Valerie Williams